In another world, it might have been a scandal that the greatest genius in human history was a Christian heretic, but in our world the scandal is that he was a Christian heretic. That Newton rejected the doctrine of the Trinity–not because he was Enlightened like 18th century Deists but because of his own interpretation of scripture and the Ante-Nicene Fathers–has been well-known for some time, but a new book brings out some interesting details of which I was unaware.
By the middle of the following decade, when he gave much of his energies over to alchemy and the decoding of apocalyptic prophecy, he had an even more remarkable idea. When mankind was still young, “before the first memory of things”, Newton surmised, Noah and his sons had come up with a pure and pristine form of worship that subsequent prophets – Christ among them – had contrived only to debase.
The original religion had found its expression in holy flames surrounded by vestal temples such as Stonehenge and St Bridget’s fire, a Christianized pagan observance that persists today in the grounds of Kildare Cathedral in Ireland. These shrines, Newton wrote, stood allegorically for the place of the Sun at the centre of God’s cosmos. Over time, the metaphors had gradually come to obscure the truths they depicted, and as the sacred learning was passed down by Moses and the ancient Egyptians, the prisca sapientia had degenerated into idolatry.
…
This conviction led Newton down some strange byways. At one point he defended the account of Egyptian theology in Aristophanes’ The Birds, where Night is said to have spread her black wings over the chaotic void and laid an egg containing Love, which eventually hatched and created all the gods and living things. Night, Newton explained, was the unseen deity, and Love the spirit that had moved over the face of the waters in Genesis 2. He also thought that Plato had ultimately inherited an understanding of universal gravitation from the same source, and that before him Pythagoras had hit on the inverse-square law by hanging hammers of different weights from taut sheep intestines.
…
If there was one man who in Newton’s eyes had done more than any other to lead humanity astray, it was Athanasius…
The article’s author tries desperately to try to find some anticipation of the Enlightenment in all of this, but he must concede that Newton “seems to have spent more time mentally in the fourth century than in the seventeenth” (which I think underestimates how much the fourth century was still alive in the seventeenth). What we do see is continuations of distinctly Renaissance and Reformation modes of thought. From the Renaissance there is the idea of a common wisdom of the ancients and the sages of all lands. Remember, Newton is mentally much closer to Plato and Dante than he is to us. He doesn’t believe in evolution, and he reads scripture much more literally than today’s conservative Christians. He doesn’t imagine that man ascended from savagery; he imagines that man descended from Eden and then from the Noah. Naturally, these early men with more direct intercourse with God would have known more than we. From the Reformation, there is the idea that the original wisdom has been lost and must be recovered, that we access it not through tradition but by leaping past it. Luther and the other early Reformers would have been appalled by Newton’s conclusions, but they also sought to consult scripture and the apostolic Church directly, apart from the medium of tradition. (The goal: every Christian a priest. The danger: the scholarly guild a new papacy.)
Newton spent (some might say wasted) a lot of time consulting apocalyptic literature to predict the fall of that Antichrist, the Papacy. Interestingly, he tags the same year that I did: 2016. Granted, the set of people who believe the Papacy is the Antichrist and that Amoris laetitia is a disaster because it undermines Catholic doctrine is the empty set. Still, the coincidence is kind of creepy.
Filed under: Uncategorized | 4 Comments »