Abortion’s other victim

Even if we succeed in outlawing abortion someday, would it really be fair to punish abortion doctors?

Bernard Nathanson in his book Aborting America observes that women who procure abortions seem undisturbed by the procedure, but it often takes a greater psychological toll on abortionists.  Objectively speaking, both mothers (-to-be, if you prefer) and abortionists are engaged in murder, but culpability is a more subtle thing.  The abortionist may be less likely to be aware of the nature of the fetus than the mother.  He lacks her maternal instinct and her genetic closeness, indeed physical connection, to the fetus.  The humanity/personhood of the fetus is a philosophical rather than empirical truth, and the abortion doctor is likely to have been exposed to reductionist metaphysics and utilitarian ethics and to have been trained to think of everyone as “just a clump of cells”.  It’s only fair to put oneself in the place of an abortionist.  Women are continually enticing him, practically throwing money at him to perform these procedures.  He has invested time and money into being qualified to perform these procedures, and he has invested his ego in the belief that what he does is a service to rather than a crime against humanity.  Such things can be hard to change.  In the broader culture, there is an idea people have of abortion doctors as people who snuff out fetuses, and we shouldn’t be surprised if some of them live down to our expectations of them.

Of course, I’m not saying that abortionists should never under any circumstances be punished.  There may be cases where it can be proven that they are fully aware of what they are doing.  This would be true if it could be demonstrated that a given abortion doctor actually harbors pro-life convictions.  In this case, it may make sense to punish him.

9 Responses

  1. […] Abortion’s other victim […]

  2. I think what is necessary is good discernment.

  3. I presume this is written with much irony.

  4. You may presume.

  5. Sounds like empathy and rule-of-law are mutually exclusive. Good news is, I don’t need an alibi for my next crime, just a good sob story.

  6. he who delivered me to you has the greater sin

  7. If you want fewer abortions, you need to disincentivize it from as many angles as possible, not from as few as possible.

    I want would-be abortionists thinking “I could get in a lot of trouble for doing this; it wouldn’t be worthwhile.”

    Supposing individual illegal abortions typically could be detected, it should be possible in many of those cases to determine paternity. If it can be proven that the would-be father encouraged the abortion or knew about it and did nothing to stop it, he should be charged as well. Like the doctor, I want the would-be father thinking about how it could negatively affect him if he let the would-be mother get an abortion.

    I don’t know whether all 3 parties should face the same consequences, but it seems obvious they should all face harsh penalties.

  8. If you take out a “hit” on someone, both the hitman (the abortionist, if you will) and you are charged with a crime, not just the hitman and not just you. Obviously you can take this analogy only so far.

  9. […] Bonald engages in a bit of Swiftian satire regarding Abortion’s other victim. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: