As we watch the mainstream Right sliding constantly Left, we often forget how already compromised they were to begin with. Edward Feser’s post on Frank Meyer has got me wondering if there ever was a conservative movement in America, properly speaking. It seems that even in the mainstream movements alleged heyday, the lead intellectuals were fatally corrupted by libertarianism, and the stupid “you can’t force virtue” argument is nothing new to Republicans. Meyer was the principle proponent of “fusionism”, the combination of libertarianism as the state ideology and traditional morality for private life. In truth, such a fusion is unworkable. It implicitly favors libertinism and inevitably leads to libertinism’s triumph over both public and private spheres. As Feser points out, we often can make virtue easier and vice harder by using laws to influence the communal environment in positive ways. As I have said in several writings, the communal consensus is itself something that is worthy of defense and official promotion, because the “free marketplace of ideas” and “experiments in living” always mean a race to the bottom. Finally, as Proph forcefully states, given our official ideology of non-discrimination, it will be impossible for social sanctions to long discourage behavior once the government accepts that behavior:
Five years after drugs get legalized, it will be illegal to discriminate against drug users for employment. Then it will be illegal to ask them to leave the building to use their drugs; employers will be required to set aside special rooms for users. Ten years later, drug users will qualify for Medicaid coverage. Fifteen years and they’ll be teaching kids how to use needles in sixth grade home ec class.
The notion that society will police drug use itself hinges on the notion that social conventions built up in the context of a pre-legalization society will persist post-legalization. They won’t. Drug use, even heavy and destructive drug use, will not only be legalized and tolerated, it will receiveexplicit legal and financial protections, including welfare, health care coverage for the inevitable tidal wave of public health problems that would result, some kind of disability insurance for those rendered useless and unemployable, etc.
Let Christian conservatives cleave to the doctrine of the social kingship of Christ as our great philosophically superior alternative to the self-destructive nihilistic individualism of our godless mainstream parties.